On the day when the police arrested the activists who were throwing eggs at a mural dedicated to Ratko Mladić, the MPs did not do very well, or at least did not receive instructions on what to say. That is why they were better prepared for the next day to give their view on why Serbs or at least the Serbian Progressive Party considered Mladić to be a hero, when the Law on Business Companies was on the agenda.
“Yesterday you saw the savagery in the centre of Belgrade, the savagery of various autochauvinists in Njegoševa street in Vračar because of the mural of General Ratko Mladić; you saw Aida Ćorović and others who present themselves as some kind of civic activists, while they actually are ordinary party activists. Different political options, who all come from the former Democratic Party.”
“And I think Ratko Mladić is Serbia’s favourite, regardless of The Hague verdicts, not because something happened in Srebrenica, because a war crime was committed there, for which I don’t know if he, or someone lower in the hierarchical chain, is responsible. He’s [our] favourite because he led the army of the Republika Srpska, to defend the Serbian people in Bosnia and Herzegovina. That is why we, Serbs, love him, not because he killed someone, or is formally responsible for the crime committed against Bosnians.“
“As a matter of fact, the mural to Ratko Mladić was only abused to put additional pressure on the state of Serbia and to put additional pressure on President Aleksandar Vučić. The police didn’t guard that mural last night and all day yesterday because of the citizens, the police simply maintained public order and peace. “
“When it comes to The Hague tribunal and in relation to the mural to Ratko Mladić, if you’ll allow, I personally, and probably a large number of citizens, we don’t acknowledge The Hague tribunal.” ”…Speaking of Ratko Mladić, I’ll say it, Ratko Mladić is a Serbian hero.“
Even if only these four persons spoke about Mladić, the Speakers did not mind. A deafening silence of all the others reigned. The part of the Serbian people that is ashamed of war crimes does not have its representatives in the Assembly. The MPs from Bosnian, Albanian and even Hungarian parties are not used to interfere in such topics.
For the Open Parliament, Mirjana Nikolić.
Predsednik Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije Ivica Dačić sazvao je Sedmu sednicu Drugog redovnog zasedanja Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije u 2021. godini, za utorak, 23. novembar 2021. godine, sa početkom u 10.00 časova.
1. Predlog zakona o budžetu Republike Srbije za 2022. godinu, sa Predlogom odluke o davanju saglasnosti na Finansijski plan Republičkog fonda za penzijsko i invalidsko osiguranje za 2022. godinu, Predlogom odluke o davanju saglasnosti na Finansijski plan Republičkog fonda za zdravstveno osiguranje za 2022. godinu, Predlogom odluke o davanju saglasnosti na Finansijski plan Fonda za socijalno osiguranje vojnih osiguranika za 2022. godinu i Predlogom odluke o davanju saglasnosti na Finansijski plan Nacionalne službe za zapošljavanje za 2022. godinu, koji je podnela Vlada;
2. Predlog zakona o izmenama i dopuni Zakona o budžetskom sistemu, koji je podnela Vlada;
3. Predlog zakona o dopunama Zakona o porezu na dobit pravnih lica, koji je podnela Vlada;
4. Predlog zakona o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o porezu na dohodak građana, koji je podnela Vlada;
5. Predlog zakona o izmenama Zakona o porezima na upotrebu, držanje i nošenje dobara, koji je podnela Vlada;
6. Predlog zakona o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o porezima na imovinu, koji je podnela Vlada;
7. Predlog zakona o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o doprinosima za obavezno socijalno osiguranje, koji je podnela Vlada;
8. Predlog zakona o budžetskoj inspekciji, koji je podnela Vlada;
9. Predlog zakona o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o eksproprijaciji, koji je podnela Vlada;
10. Predlog zakona o izmenama i dopunama Carinskog zakona, koji je podnela Vlada;
11. Predlog zakona o završnom računu budžeta Republike Srbije za 2020. godinu, koji je podnela Vlada;
12. Predlog zakona o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o zaposlenima u autonomnim pokrajinama i jedinicama lokalne samouprave, koji je podnela Vlada;
13. Predlog zakona o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o poljoprivredi i ruralnom razvoju, koji je podnela Vlada;
14. Predlog zakona o regulisanju obaveza Republike Srbije prema Međunarodnom monetarnom fondu po osnovu korišćenja sredstava opšte alokacije specijalnih prava vučenja odobrenih Odlukom Odbora guvernera Međunarodnog monetarnog fonda od 2. avgusta 2021. godine, koji je podnela Vlada;
15. Predlog zakona o potvrđivanju Sporazuma o zajmu između KfW, Frankfurt na Majni („KfW“) i Republike Srbije koju predstavlja ministar finansija („Zajmoprimac“) za Program „Integrisano upravljanje čvrstim otpadom, faza I“, koji je podnela Vlada;
16. Predlog odluke o razrešenju članova Nacionalnog saveta za kulturu, koji je podneo Odbor za kulturu i informisanje i
17. Predlog članova Nacionalnog saveta za kulturu, koji je podneo Odbor za kulturu i informisanje.
Predsednik Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije Ivica Dačić sazvao je Osmu sednicu Drugog redovnog zasedanja Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije u 2021. godini, za četvrtak, 25. novembar 2021. godine, sa početkom u 10.00 časova.
1. Predlog zakona o referendumu i narodnoj inicijativi, koji je podnela Vlada.
Predsednik Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije Ivica Dačić sazvao je 49. sastanak Kolegijuma Narodne skupštine Dvanaestog saziva za utorak, 16. novembar 2021. godine, sa početkom u 9.00 časova.
U danu kada je policija hapsila aktivistkinje koje su jajima gađale mural posvećen Ratku Mladiću, poslanici se nisu baš najbolje snašli, ili nisu dobili instrukcije šta treba da kažu. Zato su se za sutra bolje pripremili da, dok je na dnevnom redu Zakon o privrednim društvima, daju svoje viđenje zašto Srbi ili bar Srpska napredna stranka Mladića smatra herojem.
“Videli ste juče ono divljanje u centru Beograda, divljanje raznih autošovinista u Njegoševoj ulici na Vračaru zbog murala generala Ratka Mladića, videli ste Aidu Ćorović i ostale koji se predstavljaju kao nekakvi građanski aktivisti, a svi do jednog su najobičniji partijski aktivisti. Različitih političkih opcija, ali sve one potiču iz nekada Demokratske stranke.”
"I mislim da je Ratko Mladić, omiljen u Srbiji, bez obzira na haške presude, ne zato što se nešto desilo u Srebrenici, zato što je tamo izvršen ratni zločin, za koji ne znam da li je on odgovoran, ili neko niže u hijerarhijskom lancu, nego je omiljen zato što je stao na čelo vojske Republike Srpske, da odbrane srpski narod u BiH. Zato ga mi Srbi volimo, a ne zato što je ubio nekog, ili formacijski odgovoran za počinjen zločin nad Bošnjacima."
“Naime, mural Ratku Mladiću je samo zloupotrebljen da se izvrši dodatni pritisak na državu Srbiju i da se izvrši dodatni pritisak na predsednika Aleksandra Vučića. Zbog građana Srbije policija sinoć ili juče tokom celog dana nije čuvala taj mural, policija je samo održavala javni red i mir.“
“Kad smo kod Haškog tribunala, a vezano za napade na mural Ratka Mladića, dozvolite da kažem, evo ja lično, a verovatno i najveći broj građana, ne priznajemo Haški tribunal.” ... ”Kada smo već kod Ratka Mladića, evo, ja kažem da je Ratko Mladić srpski heroj.“
I neka su o Mladiću govorila samo ova četvorica, predsedavajućima nije smetalo, a gromoglasno je bilo i ćutanje svih ostalih. Deo srpskog naroda koji se stidi ratnih zločina, nema svoje predstavnike u Skupštini. Poslanici bošnjačkih, albanskih pa i mađarskih partija odavno su navikli da se u ovakve teme ne uključuju.
Za Otvoreni parlament Mirjana Nikolić.
Saša Janković has not been the Protector of the Citizens of Serbia for four years, but try remembering who is (no Googling!) The MPs could not, so they criticised the former one out of habit, and sent a message to the current one not to relax and not to think that he is really independent.
“When you choose a law graduate as the Protector of Citizens, that is not an absolute guarantee that he will do his job well. A typical example is Saša Janković. The man was a jurist, but did he do his job well as the Protector of Citizens? He did not. He wanted to run for President of the Republic from the position of the Protector of Citizens, and eventually, he did.”
“When it comes to the former Protector of Citizens Saša Janković, to the people and MPs also known as “Sale the Saluting Gun”, he knowingly violated the Law on the Protector of Citizens by analysing and giving daily political assessments of the political situation in Serbia..“
“Well, if we have protectors of citizens like these two so far, they [might] also get crazy from fame and money and won’t know anymore what they’re doing and how much damage they are doing to Serbia.“
“If someone violated the Law on Conflict of Interest, then it is the very former Protector of Citizens Saša Janković. I am not a jurist, but I believe that if there was someone who was in a conflict of interest and broke the law, then that was exactly him.“
“Feuilletons and films and series will probably be made about Saša Janković. The series, or the film would be called – The Protector. That film would talk about how Saša Janković as the Protector of Citizens, did not protect citizens, and in a part of that film or series there would probably be little talk about the affair - The Gun, and about some investigations.“
“In his recent interview, Saša Janković admits that he was politically engaged, politically involved, and that certain foreign embassies did everything [in their power], and recruited various people in order to violently overthrow the President of the Republic of Serbia, Mr. Aleksandar Vučić. He is no longer the Ombudsman, but I certainly wonder where that Ombudsman institution is when someone threatens President Aleksandar Vučić and his family.“
“Saša Janković knew that he could not defeat Aleksandar Vučić in the presidential elections, but he wanted to, and worked for years to satanise Aleksandar Vučić and his family and the SNS, to provoke the critical mass that would come to power by force.“
Despite the general dissatisfaction with the work of this institution, the MPs eventually voted that the ombudsman does not have to be a lawyer, that he shall be elected for an eight-year term and continue to receive a salary equal to the salary of the President of the Constitutional Court.
For the Open Parliament, Mirjana Nikolić.
Predsednik Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije Ivica Dačić sazvao je 48. sastanak Kolegijuma Narodne skupštine Dvanaestog saziva za utorak, 9. novembar 2021. godine, sa početkom u 9.00 časova.
Saša Janković već četiri godine nije zaštitnik građana Srbije, a probajte bez guglanja da se setite ko jeste. Nisu mogli da se sete ni narodni poslanici, pa su ovog bivšeg kritikovali po navici, a ovom aktuelnom poslali poruku da se ipak ne opušta i ne pomisli da je stvarno nezavisan.
„Kada za zaštitnika građana izaberete diplomiranog pravnika to vam nije apsolutna garancija da će on dobro da radi svoj posao. Tipičan primer je Saša Janković. Čovek je bio pravnik, ali da li je dobro radio svoj posao Zaštitnika građana? Nije. On je hteo da se sa pozicije Zaštitnika građana, i to je na kraju krajeva i učinio, kandiduje za predsednika Republike.“
„Kada je u pitanju bivši zaštitnik građana Saša Janković, u narodu znani, a i nama poslanicima, kao "Sale prangija", on je svesno kršio Zakon o Zaštitniku građana tako što je analizirao i davao svakodnevno političke ocene o političkoj situaciji u Srbiji.“
„Pa ako budemo imali zaštitnike građana kao ovu dvojicu do sada, pa njih ubija i slava i pare u glavu i više ne znaju šta rade i koliku štetu nanose Srbiji.“
„Ako je neko kršio Zakon o sukobu interesa, pa onda je to upravo bivši Zaštitnik građana Saša Janković. Ja nisam pravnik, ali smatram da ako je neko bio u sukobu interesa i kršio zakon onda je upravo to on.“
„O Saši Jankoviću će se verovatno pisati feljtoni i snimati filmovi i serije. Serija bi se ta zvala, ili film – Zaštitnik. U tom filmu bi se govorilo o tome kako Saša Janković kao Zaštitnik građana nije štitio građane i verovatno bi u delu tog filma ili serije se malo govorilo o aferi – pištolj i o nekim istragama.“
„Saša Janković, u svom intervjuu koji je nedavno dao, sam priznaje da je bio i te kako politički upleten, politički involviran i kako su određene strane ambasade činile sve i vrbovale razne ljude kako bi na nasilan način srušili predsednika Republike Srbije, gospodina Aleksandra Vučića. On više nije Ombudsman, ali svakako se pitam gde je ta institucija Ombudsmana kada neko preti predsedniku Aleksandru Vučiću i njegovoj porodici?“
„Znao je Saša Janković da ne može da pobedi Aleksandra Vučića na izborima za predsednika, ali je hteo i godinama je radio na tome da satanizuje i Aleksandra Vučića i njegovu porodicu i SNS, da izazove tu kritičnu masu koja bi na nasilnim putem dovela na vlast.“
I pored opšteg nezadovoljstva radom ove institucije, poslanici su na kraju glasali da ombudsman ne mora da bude pravnik, da se bira na mandat od osam godina i da i dalje prima platu u visini plate predsednika Ustavnog suda.
Za Otvoreni parlament Mirjana Nikolić.
Predsednik Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije Ivica Dačić, sazvao je Šestu sednicu Drugog redovnog zasedanja Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije u 2021. godini, za utorak, 9. novembar 2021. godine, sa početkom u 10.00 časova.
1. Predlog zakona o biocidnim proizvodima, koji je podnela Vlada;
2. Predlog zakona o izmenama Zakona o integrisanom sprečavanju i kontroli zagađivanja životne sredine, koji je podnela Vlada;
3. Predlog zakona o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o privrednim društvima, koji je podnela Vlada;
4. Predlog zakona o potvrđivanju Izmene Sporazuma o poljoprivrednim proizvodima između Republike Srbije i Kraljevine Norveške, koji je podnela Vlada;
5. Predlog zakona o potvrđivanju Sporazuma o saradnji u zaštiti od katastrofa na Zapadnom Balkanu, koji je podnela Vlada;
6. Predlog zakona o potvrđivanju Sporazuma o uzajamnom priznavanju i zameni vozačkih dozvola između Vlade Republike Srbije i Vlade Narodne Republike Kine, koji je podnela Vlada;
7. Predlog odluke o prestanku funkcije javnog tužioca u Osnovnom javnom tužilaštvu u Kuršumliji, koji je podneo Odbor za pravosuđe, državnu upravu i lokalnu samoupravu;
8. Predlog odluke o izboru predsednika sudova, koji je podneo Visoki savet sudstva;
9. Predlog odluke o izboru sudije koji se prvi put bira na sudijsku funkciju, koji je podneo Visoki savet sudstva i
10. Predlog odluke o izboru dva člana Republičke komisije za zaštitu prava u postupcima javnih nabavki, koji je podneo Odbor za finansije, republički budžet i kontrolu trošenja javnih sredstava.
On the agenda – laws that allegedly strengthen the institutions of the Protector of Citizens and the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance. In the debate – proof of how the MPs and ministers of the Serbian Progressive Party actually perceive the independence of the institutions. It is good to have them, but only if they defend ‘us’, and not criticise the government like those who were in power before did.
“These independent institutions are nowhere to be found when they should be condemning the attacks on Aleksandar Vučić’s family members. The Commissioner for Gender Equality is nowhere to be found either, nor the Protector of Citizens when the daily ‘Danas’ publishes on its front page allegations against Danilo Vučić. There are no SNS officials to condemn such attacks. They’d probably be harsher if someone hit a dog on the street.”
“So, I will talk about the endangered and neglected rights and freedoms of the President of the Republic, his son Danilo and his brother Andrej, but also of other members of the Vučić family. […] one important question arises – who protects the endangered rights and neglected rights and freedoms of the persons I have mentioned?”
“Today, Serbia is trapped, and it’s up to us, only on the SNS representatives in Serbia, to point out these two parallel processes. We must strengthen, build institutions, the independence of our institutions, which is the main task in this Parliament today and the topic on the agenda. At the same time, I, as a member of the Government, you, as SNS MPs, must not neglect, must not ignore the process that is taking place, and that is the process of dehumanisation of the Vučićs because one of them is Aleksandar Vučić, the President of Serbia.“
“The security of the Vučić family is seriously endangered and everyone is silent, journalists’ associations are silent. I don’t condemn journalists or media, but I will just say that they’re supporting such statements by their silence.“
“I really expect the Protector of Citizens to be the Protector of Citizens, but of each citizen, primarily the Protector of the one for whom the majority of Serbian citizens voted, and that is the President of Serbia. It is really inconceivable to me that the Protector of Citizens does not deal with the protection of the President and the threats that all of us MPs, mostly Bakarec and my fellow colleague Marijan Rističeveć receive every day via social networks from Đilas, Marinika Tepić, Jeremić and other members of their gang.“
“When the citizens of Serbia hear the words Protector of Citizens, it gives them some confidence. The citizens are Aleksandar Vučić and Danilo Vučić and Andrej Vučić, they are all citizens of Serbia. Do they have the same rights as other citizens? Does anyone guarantee them any rights?”
There was not much talk about other possible obligations of the Protector of Citizens in this debate, because to this ruling majority, this does not really matter.
For the Open Parliament, Mirjana Nikolić.